Advanced search


Search results        Search results      Copy URL to E-Mail


Clinical Reasoning and Practices in the Osteopathic Management of Visceral Disorders: A Grounded Theory Study in the Italian Context

Journal: Healthcare Date: 2025/08, 13(16):Pages: 1995. doi: Subito , type of study: qualitative study

Free full text   (https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/13/16/1995)

Keywords:

clinical practice [24]
clinical reasoning [73]
diagnosis [372]
evidence-based medicine [125]
interdisciplinarity [31]
Italy [19]
osteopaths [217]
qualitative study [271]
therapeutic process [49]
visceral osteopathy [79]

Abstract:

BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE: Visceral disorders, both functional and organic, significantly impact health-related quality of life and pose a challenge for healthcare systems. Osteopathy offers manual, systemic, and patient-centered approaches for their management, yet these remain controversial due to limited scientific support and methodological inconsistencies. In the evolving landscape of healthcare regulation in Europe, and particularly in Italy, exploring clinical reasoning and operational models in visceral osteopathy is essential. This study aimed to explore the beliefs, clinical reasoning, and management strategies of experienced Italian osteopaths in the treatment of visceral disorders using a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach. METHODS: This qualitative study applied a Constructivist Grounded Theory approach to explore the beliefs and clinical practices of 10 experienced Italian osteopaths. Semi-structured interviews were transcribed, coded, and thematically analyzed, integrating literature comparisons to support theory generation. RESULTS: Four core themes emerged: (1) education and professional development, (2) definition and identification of visceral disorders, (3) clinical management strategies, and (4) multidisciplinary collaboration. The findings reveal marked heterogeneity in diagnostic frameworks and treatment rationales, often driven by tradition and subjective interpretation rather than empirical evidence. Palpatory assessments were frequently prioritized over patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: The study highlights substantial fragmentation in Italian visceral osteopathic practice, echoing challenges across Europe. Promoting a shift towards critical thinking, evidence-based models, shared terminology, and interprofessional integration is essential for contextualising osteopathic contributions to the care of individuals presenting with visceral-related problems. These findings provide insights into the fragmented clinical practices of Italian osteopaths and may contribute to shaping a more critical and evidence-informed approach within Italian osteopathic practice and professional development, which is now more relevant than ever, given the recent integration of osteopathy into the Italian higher education system.


Search results      Copy URL to E-Mail

 
 
 






  • ImpressumLegal noticeDatenschutz


ostlib.de/data_jmtkgczbxqhfdawpsrvu



Supported by

OSTLIB recommends