Advanced search

Search results      


Manipulation in the presence of cervical spinal cord compression: a case series

Journal: Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics Date: 2006/03, 29(3):Pages: 236-244. doi: Subito , type of study: case series

Full text    (https://www.jmptonline.org/article/S0161-4754(06)00024-8/fulltext)

Keywords:

arm [40]
case series [40]
cervical spine [210]
neck [158]
OMT [2951]
osteopathic manipulative treatment [2973]
spinal cord compression [1]
spinal manipulation [74]

Abstract:

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to present information from a series of patients with imaging findings of encroachment on the cervical spinal cord who were treated with chiropractic cervical manipulation. CASE SERIES There were 27 patients (18 females, 9 males; age range, 23-65, mean age, 44.3 years) with neck and/or arm pain with findings of cervical spinal cord encroachment on magnetic resonance imaging. None of these patients had severe or acute myelopathy or advanced signal changes in the spinal cord indicative of myelomalacia. These patients were treated with a variety of approaches that included some form of cervical manipulation. The mean number of treatments that included manipulation was 12 (range, 2-32). Nineteen patients were treated with high-velocity, low-amplitude “thrust“ manipulation, 9 patients were treated with low-velocity muscle energy technique, and 1 patient was treated with both methods. The mean patient-rated subjective improvement at the last follow-up reexamination was 70.0% (range, 10%-100%). From baseline to the last follow-up examination, the mean improvements in outcome measures were as follows: Bournemouth Neck Disability Questionnaire, 23.7 points (31%); Neck Disability Index, 6.4 points; and Numerical Pain Rating Scale, 3.9 points. In 3 patients, there was increased pain after manipulation that lasted from 1 to 4 days. There were no major complications, and in no patient did any increased pain after treatment last more than 4 days. No new neurologic symptoms or signs were seen in any of these patients. CONCLUSION The finding of cervical spinal cord encroachment on magnetic resonance imaging, in and of itself, should not necessarily be considered an absolute contraindication to manipulation. However, because radicular and myelopathic complications to cervical manipulation have been reported in the literature, great care should be taken in all cases, particularly those in which anatomic conditions such as cord encroachment are present.


Search results      

 
 
 






  • ImpressumLegal noticeDatenschutz


ostlib.de/data_wdxjhspbqemcknfguytz



Supported by

OSTLIB recommends