Search results      Copy URL to E-Mail

---

Journal: Cureus Date: 2026/01, 18(1):Pages: e101225. doi: Subito , type of study: article

Free full text   (https://www.cureus.com/articles/446720-the-standing-forward-flexion-test-in-manual-therapy-a-critical-review-and-a-functional-reinterpretation#!/)

Keywords:

article [2530]
clinical utility [1]
diagnosis [382]
lumbopelvic rhythm [1]
mobility [90]
palpatory tests [3]
sacroiliac joint [72]
standing forward flexion test [2]

Abstract:

The standing forward flexion test (SFT) is widely used in manual and osteopathic practice as a palpatory assessment traditionally interpreted as a test for sacroiliac joint dysfunction. Despite its popularity, the clinical meaning of SFT findings remains controversial, particularly in light of evidence demonstrating the minimal intrinsic mobility of the sacroiliac joint, high prevalence of pelvic morphological asymmetries, and multifactorial determinants of posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS) motion. Several studies have questioned the clinical utility of the SFT, reporting poor inter-examiner reliability when the test is performed without standardized procedures or adequate examiner training. This critical narrative review aims to re-examine the SFT by clearly distinguishing issues of reproducibility from those of interpretative validity, and by integrating biomechanical, anatomical, and myofascial evidence. The available literature indicates that, following specific and standardized training, the SFT may achieve acceptable levels of reproducibility and inter-examiner agreement. However, PSIS asymmetries observed during trunk flexion appear to reflect global adaptations of the lumbopelvic complex, including pelvic morphology, hip mobility, and cranial and caudal myofascial tension, rather than isolated sacroiliac joint motion. From this perspective, the SFT shows important limitations in terms of content, construct, and criterion validity when used as a diagnostic test for sacroiliac pathology. Instead, it may be more appropriately interpreted as a functional assessment of lumbopelvic rhythm during the transition from trunk extension to flexion. Abandoning a binary positive/negative interpretation in favor of a graded, context-dependent evaluation may enhance the clinical relevance of the SFT when integrated into a comprehensive biomechanical assessment.

---

Search results      Copy URL to E-Mail